逐节对照
- 新标点和合本 - 先前的条例,因软弱无益,所以废掉了,
- 和合本2010(上帝版-简体) - 一方面,先前的诫命因软弱无能而废掉了,
- 和合本2010(神版-简体) - 一方面,先前的诫命因软弱无能而废掉了,
- 当代译本 - 以前的条例由于本身的弱点和无用被废除了,
- 圣经新译本 - 一方面,从前的条例因为软弱,没有用处,就废弃了;
- 中文标准译本 - 原来,一方面,先前的条例因着本身的软弱和无用,就被废弃了,
- 现代标点和合本 - 先前的条例因软弱无益,所以废掉了——
- 和合本(拼音版) - 先前的条例因软弱无益,所以废掉了,
- New International Version - The former regulation is set aside because it was weak and useless
- New International Reader's Version - The old rule is set aside. It was weak and useless.
- English Standard Version - For on the one hand, a former commandment is set aside because of its weakness and uselessness
- New Living Translation - Yes, the old requirement about the priesthood was set aside because it was weak and useless.
- Christian Standard Bible - So the previous command is annulled because it was weak and unprofitable
- New American Standard Bible - For, on the one hand, there is the nullification of a former commandment because of its weakness and uselessness
- New King James Version - For on the one hand there is an annulling of the former commandment because of its weakness and unprofitableness,
- Amplified Bible - For, on the one hand, a former commandment is cancelled because of its weakness and uselessness [because of its inability to justify the sinner before God]
- American Standard Version - For there is a disannulling of a foregoing commandment because of its weakness and unprofitableness
- King James Version - For there is verily a disannulling of the commandment going before for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof.
- New English Translation - On the one hand a former command is set aside because it is weak and useless,
- World English Bible - For there is an annulling of a foregoing commandment because of its weakness and uselessness
- 新標點和合本 - 先前的條例,因軟弱無益,所以廢掉了,
- 和合本2010(上帝版-繁體) - 一方面,先前的誡命因軟弱無能而廢掉了,
- 和合本2010(神版-繁體) - 一方面,先前的誡命因軟弱無能而廢掉了,
- 當代譯本 - 以前的條例由於本身的弱點和無用被廢除了,
- 聖經新譯本 - 一方面,從前的條例因為軟弱,沒有用處,就廢棄了;
- 呂振中譯本 - 這一來 ,一方面因規條之劣弱和無益,先前的條例就被廢掉(
- 中文標準譯本 - 原來,一方面,先前的條例因著本身的軟弱和無用,就被廢棄了,
- 現代標點和合本 - 先前的條例因軟弱無益,所以廢掉了——
- 文理和合譯本 - 夫前誡因荏弱無益而廢、
- 文理委辦譯本 - 夫舊法無益、罔有功效、則遂廢弛、
- 施約瑟淺文理新舊約聖經 - 前之法度、輕弱無益、故廢之、
- 吳經熊文理聖詠與新經全集 - 是則舊制由於荏弱無能、而遭廢棄、
- Nueva Versión Internacional - Por una parte, la ley anterior queda anulada por ser inútil e ineficaz,
- 현대인의 성경 - 옛 계명은 약하고 쓸모가 없어서 폐지되었습니다.
- Новый Русский Перевод - Итак, прежнее повеление отменено, потому что оно оказалось слабым и бесполезным
- Восточный перевод - Прежнее повеление отменено, потому что оно оказалось слабым и бесполезным
- Восточный перевод, версия с «Аллахом» - Прежнее повеление отменено, потому что оно оказалось слабым и бесполезным
- Восточный перевод, версия для Таджикистана - Прежнее повеление отменено, потому что оно оказалось слабым и бесполезным
- La Bible du Semeur 2015 - D’une part donc, la règle antérieure se trouve abrogée parce qu’elle était impuissante et inutile.
- リビングバイブル - 家系を重んじる古い祭司職の制度は廃止されました。それは人々を救う力のない無益な制度でした。
- Nestle Aland 28 - ἀθέτησις μὲν γὰρ γίνεται προαγούσης ἐντολῆς διὰ τὸ αὐτῆς ἀσθενὲς καὶ ἀνωφελές –
- unfoldingWord® Greek New Testament - ἀθέτησις μὲν γὰρ γίνεται προαγούσης ἐντολῆς, διὰ τὸ αὐτῆς ἀσθενὲς, καὶ ἀνωφελές
- Nova Versão Internacional - A ordenança anterior é revogada, porque era fraca e inútil
- Hoffnung für alle - Die alte Ordnung ist damit ungültig geworden; sie war wirkungslos und brachte keinen Nutzen.
- Kinh Thánh Hiện Đại - Luật lệ cổ truyền về chức tế lễ đã bị bãi bỏ vì suy yếu và vô hiệu.
- พระคริสตธรรมคัมภีร์ไทย ฉบับอมตธรรมร่วมสมัย - กฎระเบียบเดิมถูกล้มเลิกไปเนื่องจากไม่มีประสิทธิภาพและเปล่าประโยชน์
- พระคัมภีร์ ฉบับแปลใหม่ - กฎเกณฑ์ดั้งเดิมก็ได้ยกเลิกไป เพราะอ่อนแอและไร้ประโยชน์
交叉引用
- Hebrews 10:1 - The old plan was only a hint of the good things in the new plan. Since that old “law plan” wasn’t complete in itself, it couldn’t complete those who followed it. No matter how many sacrifices were offered year after year, they never added up to a complete solution. If they had, the worshipers would have gone blissfully on their way, no longer dragged down by their sins. But instead of removing awareness of sin, when those animal sacrifices were repeated over and over they actually heightened awareness and guilt. The plain fact is that bull and goat blood can’t get rid of sin. That is what is meant by this prophecy, put in the mouth of Christ: You don’t want sacrifices and offerings year after year; you’ve prepared a body for me for a sacrifice. It’s not fragrance and smoke from the altar that whet your appetite. So I said, “I’m here to do it your way, O God, the way it’s described in your Book.” When he said, “You don’t want sacrifices and offerings,” he was referring to practices according to the old plan. When he added, “I’m here to do it your way,” he set aside the first in order to enact the new plan—God’s way—by which we are made fit for God by the once-for-all sacrifice of Jesus.
- Galatians 4:21 - Tell me now, you who have become so enamored with the law: Have you paid close attention to that law? Abraham, remember, had two sons: one by the slave woman and one by the free woman. The son of the slave woman was born by human plotting; the son of the free woman was born by God’s promise. This illustrates the very thing we are dealing with now. The two births represent two ways of being in relationship with God. One is from Mount Sinai in Arabia. It corresponds with what is now going on in Jerusalem—a slave life, producing slaves as offspring. This is the way of Hagar. In contrast to that, there is an invisible Jerusalem, a free Jerusalem, and she is our mother—this is the way of Sarah. Remember what Isaiah wrote: Rejoice, barren woman who bears no children, shout and cry out, woman who has no birth pangs, Because the children of the barren woman now surpass the children of the chosen woman. Isn’t it clear, friends, that you, like Isaac, are children of promise? In the days of Hagar and Sarah, the child who came from faithless plotting (Ishmael) harassed the child who came—empowered by the Spirit—from the faithful promise (Isaac). Isn’t it clear that the harassment you are now experiencing from the Jerusalem heretics follows that old pattern? There is a Scripture that tells us what to do: “Expel the slave mother with her son, for the slave son will not inherit with the free son.” Isn’t that conclusive? We are not children of the slave woman, but of the free woman.
- Romans 3:31 - But by shifting our focus from what we do to what God does, don’t we cancel out all our careful keeping of the rules and ways God commanded? Not at all. What happens, in fact, is that by putting that entire way of life in its proper place, we confirm it.
- Galatians 3:15 - Friends, let me give you an example from everyday affairs of the free life I am talking about. Once a person’s will has been signed, no one else can annul it or add to it. Now, the promises were made to Abraham and to his descendant. You will observe that Scripture, in the careful language of a legal document, does not say “to descendants,” referring to everybody in general, but “to your descendant” (the noun, note, is singular), referring to Christ. This is the way I interpret this: A will, earlier signed by God, is not annulled by an addendum attached 430 years later, thereby negating the promise of the will. No, this addendum, with its instructions and regulations, has nothing to do with the promised inheritance in the will.
- Hebrews 13:9 - Don’t be lured away from him by the latest speculations about him. The grace of Christ is the only good ground for life. Products named after Christ don’t seem to do much for those who buy them.
- Hebrews 7:11 - If the priesthood of Levi and Aaron, which provided the framework for the giving of the law, could really make people perfect, there wouldn’t have been need for a new priesthood like that of Melchizedek. But since it didn’t get the job done, there was a change of priesthood, which brought with it a radical new kind of law. There is no way of understanding this in terms of the old Levitical priesthood, which is why there is nothing in Jesus’ family tree connecting him with that priestly line.
- Romans 8:3 - God went for the jugular when he sent his own Son. He didn’t deal with the problem as something remote and unimportant. In his Son, Jesus, he personally took on the human condition, entered the disordered mess of struggling humanity in order to set it right once and for all. The law code, weakened as it always was by fractured human nature, could never have done that. The law always ended up being used as a Band-Aid on sin instead of a deep healing of it. And now what the law code asked for but we couldn’t deliver is accomplished as we, instead of redoubling our own efforts, simply embrace what the Spirit is doing in us.