Hebrews 7:11 So if the priesthood of Levi, on which the law was based, could have achieved the perfection God intended, why did God need to establish a different priestho...

7:11 NLT

逐节对照

New Living Translation - So if the priesthood of Levi, on which the law was based, could have achieved the perfection God intended, why did God need to establish a different priesthood, with a priest in the order of Melchizedek instead of the order of Levi and Aaron?
新标点和合本 - 从前百姓在利未人祭司职任以下受律法，倘若藉这职任能得完全，又何用另外兴起一位祭司，照麦基洗德的等次，不照亚伦的等次呢？
和合本2010（上帝版-简体） - 那么，如果百姓藉着利未人的祭司职任能达到完全—因为百姓是在这职分下领受律法的—为什么还需要按照麦基洗德的体系另外兴起一位祭司，而不按照亚伦的体系呢？
和合本2010（神版-简体） - 那么，如果百姓藉着利未人的祭司职任能达到完全—因为百姓是在这职分下领受律法的—为什么还需要按照麦基洗德的体系另外兴起一位祭司，而不按照亚伦的体系呢？
当代译本 - 以色列人在利未祭司制度的基础上承受律法，如果通过这个祭司制度可以达到纯全，又何必照麦基洗德的模式而不是亚伦的模式，另外兴起一位祭司呢？
圣经新译本 - 这样看来，如果藉着利未人的祭司制度能达到完全的地步（人民是在这制度下领受律法的），为什么还需要照着麦基洗德的体系，另外兴起一位祭司，而不照着亚伦的体系呢？
中文标准译本 - 既然如此，如果藉着利未人的祭司职份能达到完全——子民本来在这职份下领受了律法——那么，为什么还需要照着麦基洗德的等级，而不照着所谓“亚伦的等级”兴起另一位祭司呢？
现代标点和合本 - 从前百姓在利未人祭司职任以下受律法，倘若藉这职任能得完全，又何用另外兴起一位祭司，照麦基洗德的等次，不照亚伦的等次呢？
和合本（拼音版） - 从前百姓在利未人祭司职任以下受律法，倘若藉这职任能得完全，又何用另外兴起一位祭司，照麦基洗德的等次，不照亚伦的等次呢？
New International Version - If perfection could have been attained through the Levitical priesthood—and indeed the law given to the people established that priesthood—why was there still need for another priest to come, one in the order of Melchizedek, not in the order of Aaron?
New International Reader's Version - The law that was given to the people called for the priestly system. That system began with Levi. Suppose the priestly system could have made people perfect. Then why was there still a need for another priest to come? And why did he need to be like Melchizedek? Why wasn’t he from Aaron’s family line?
English Standard Version - Now if perfection had been attainable through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need would there have been for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, rather than one named after the order of Aaron?
The Message - If the priesthood of Levi and Aaron, which provided the framework for the giving of the law, could really make people perfect, there wouldn’t have been need for a new priesthood like that of Melchizedek. But since it didn’t get the job done, there was a change of priesthood, which brought with it a radical new kind of law. There is no way of understanding this in terms of the old Levitical priesthood, which is why there is nothing in Jesus’ family tree connecting him with that priestly line.
Christian Standard Bible - Now if perfection came through the Levitical priesthood (for on the basis of it the people received the law ), what further need was there for another priest to appear, said to be according to the order of Melchizedek and not according to the order of Aaron?
New American Standard Bible - So if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for on the basis of it the people received the Law), what further need was there for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be designated according to the order of Aaron?
New King James Version - Therefore, if perfection were through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need was there that another priest should rise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be called according to the order of Aaron?
Amplified Bible - Now if perfection [a perfect fellowship between God and the worshiper] had been attained through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people were given the Law) what further need was there for another and different kind of priest to arise, one in the manner of Melchizedek, rather than one appointed to the order of Aaron?
American Standard Version - Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it hath the people received the law), what further need was there that another priest should arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be reckoned after the order of Aaron?
King James Version - If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
New English Translation - So if perfection had in fact been possible through the Levitical priesthood – for on that basis the people received the law – what further need would there have been for another priest to arise, said to be in the order of Melchizedek and not in Aaron’s order?
World English Bible - Now if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need was there for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
新標點和合本 - 從前百姓在利未人祭司職任以下受律法，倘若藉這職任能得完全，又何用另外興起一位祭司，照麥基洗德的等次，不照亞倫的等次呢？
和合本2010（上帝版-繁體） - 那麼，如果百姓藉着利未人的祭司職任能達到完全－因為百姓是在這職分下領受律法的－為甚麼還需要按照麥基洗德的體系另外興起一位祭司，而不按照亞倫的體系呢？
和合本2010（神版-繁體） - 那麼，如果百姓藉着利未人的祭司職任能達到完全—因為百姓是在這職分下領受律法的—為甚麼還需要按照麥基洗德的體系另外興起一位祭司，而不按照亞倫的體系呢？
當代譯本 - 以色列人在利未祭司制度的基礎上承受律法，如果通過這個祭司制度可以達到純全，又何必照麥基洗德的模式而不是亞倫的模式，另外興起一位祭司呢？
聖經新譯本 - 這樣看來，如果藉著利未人的祭司制度能達到完全的地步（人民是在這制度下領受律法的），為甚麼還需要照著麥基洗德的體系，另外興起一位祭司，而不照著亞倫的體系呢？
呂振中譯本 - 這樣看來，倘若藉着利未人的祭司職分能有完全勝任的資格（而人民之領受了律法倒是以這職分為基本），哪裏還需要另一種的一位祭司興起來、是照麥基洗德的等次、而不稱為照亞倫的等次呢？
中文標準譯本 - 既然如此，如果藉著利未人的祭司職份能達到完全——子民本來在這職份下領受了律法——那麼，為什麼還需要照著麥基洗德的等級，而不照著所謂「亞倫的等級」興起另一位祭司呢？
現代標點和合本 - 從前百姓在利未人祭司職任以下受律法，倘若藉這職任能得完全，又何用另外興起一位祭司，照麥基洗德的等次，不照亞倫的等次呢？
文理和合譯本 - 昔民在利未人祭司職下受律、若由之而得完全、則何須別興一祭司依麥基洗德之班、而不謂之依亞倫班乎、
文理委辦譯本 - 昔民受律例時、利未子孫任祭司職、若人賴此、罔有缺乏、則毋庸別設一祭司、依麥基洗德班聯、不依亞倫班聯、
施約瑟淺文理新舊約聖經 - 昔民受律法、即在利未子孫得祭司職之時、若賴此祭司之職、能得成全、何用別設一祭司、循麥基洗德之等次、而不循亞倫之等次乎、又作人若賴利未子孫所得祭司之職能得成全何須別設一祭司循麥基洗德之等次而非循亞倫之等次乎民所受之律法與此祭司之職實有關係
吳經熊文理聖詠與新經全集 - 夫斯民之受律法也、乃在利未子孫為司祭之時。假使陳制而能躋人於純全之域、則何須復有異軍突起之司祭；而且此司祭何不與亞倫同一支派、而獨與麥基德同一班次耶？
Nueva Versión Internacional - Si hubiera sido posible alcanzar la perfección mediante el sacerdocio levítico (pues bajo este se le dio la ley al pueblo), ¿qué necesidad había de que más adelante surgiera otro sacerdote, según el orden de Melquisedec y no según el de Aarón?
현대인의 성경 - 하나님은 레위 계통의 제사장 직분에 근거하여 율법을 주셨습니다. 그런데 그 제사장 직무가 완전해질 수 있었다면 어째서 아론의 계통이 아닌 멜기세덱의 계통에서 다른 제사장을 세울 필요가 있었겠습니까?
Новый Русский Перевод - Если бы совершенство достигалось через священство левитов (а оно было существенной частью Закона, который был дан народу), то разве была бы нужда в другом священнике – по чину Мелхиседека, а не по чину Аарона?
Восточный перевод - Если бы цель Всевышнего достигалась через священство левитов (а оно было существенной частью Закона, который был дан народу), то разве была бы нужда в другом священнослужителе – подобном Малик-Цедеку, а не подобном Харуну?
Восточный перевод, версия с «Аллахом» - Если бы цель Аллаха достигалась через священство левитов (а оно было существенной частью Закона, который был дан народу), то разве была бы нужда в другом священнослужителе – подобном Малик-Цедеку, а не подобном Харуну?
Восточный перевод, версия для Таджикистана - Если бы цель Всевышнего достигалась через священство левитов (а оно было существенной частью Закона, который был дан народу), то разве была бы нужда в другом священнослужителе – подобном Малик-Цедеку, а не подобном Хоруну?
La Bible du Semeur 2015 - La Loi donnée au peuple d’Israël repose sur le sacerdoce lévitique. Or, s’il avait été possible d’atteindre la perfection par ce sacerdoce, pourquoi était-il nécessaire d’établir un autre prêtre, selon la ligne de Melchisédek, et non pas selon la ligne d’Aaron ?
リビングバイブル - もし、ユダヤ人の祭司と律法に私たちを救う力があるとしたら、なぜ神は、あえてアロンの位に等しい祭司〔ユダヤ人の祭司はすべてアロンの位を受け継いでいる〕ではなく、メルキゼデクの位に等しい祭司であるキリストをお立てになったのでしょうか。
Nestle Aland 28 - Εἰ μὲν οὖν τελείωσις διὰ τῆς Λευιτικῆς ἱερωσύνης ἦν, ὁ λαὸς γὰρ ἐπ’ αὐτῆς νενομοθέτηται, τίς ἔτι χρεία κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Μελχισέδεκ ἕτερον ἀνίστασθαι ἱερέα καὶ οὐ κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Ἀαρὼν λέγεσθαι;
unfoldingWord® Greek New Testament - εἰ μὲν οὖν τελείωσις διὰ τῆς Λευειτικῆς ἱερωσύνης ἦν, ὁ λαὸς γὰρ ἐπ’ αὐτῆς νενομοθέτηται, τίς ἔτι χρεία κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Μελχισέδεκ, ἕτερον ἀνίστασθαι ἱερέα, καὶ οὐ κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Ἀαρὼν λέγεσθαι?
Nova Versão Internacional - Se fosse possível alcançar a perfeição por meio do sacerdócio levítico (visto que em sua vigência o povo recebeu a Lei), por que haveria ainda necessidade de se levantar outro sacerdote, segundo a ordem de Melquisedeque e não de Arão?
Hoffnung für alle - Das Priestertum der Leviten – und das Gesetz kennt nur dieses Priestertum – konnte uns offensichtlich nicht ans Ziel bringen und mit Gott versöhnen. Sonst hätte Gott doch nicht einen ganz anderen Priester vom Rang Melchisedeks zu uns schicken müssen. Dann hätte auch ein Priester vom Rang Aarons genügt.
Kinh Thánh Hiện Đại - Nếu công việc của các thầy tế lễ dòng họ Lê-vi đã hoàn hảo và có thể cứu rỗi chúng ta, sao phải cần một thầy tế lễ khác, theo dòng Mên-chi-xê-đéc chứ không theo dòng A-rôn, họ Lê-vi? Luật pháp ban hành cho người Do Thái được xây dựng trên chức quyền của thầy tế lễ.
พระคริสตธรรมคัมภีร์ไทย ฉบับอมตธรรมร่วมสมัย - หากมนุษย์มาถึงความครบถ้วนบริบูรณ์ในพระเจ้าได้โดยทางระบอบปุโรหิตตามแบบของเลวีแล้ว (เพราะโดยพื้นฐานของระบอบนี้บทบัญญัติจึงมีมาถึงเหล่าประชากร) ทำไมยังต้องมีปุโรหิตอีกผู้หนึ่งซึ่งเป็นปุโรหิตตามแบบของเมลคีเซเดค ไม่ใช่ตามแบบของอาโรน?
พระคัมภีร์ ฉบับแปลใหม่ - บรรดาปุโรหิตที่สืบเชื้อสายจากเผ่าเลวี เป็นรากฐานอันสำคัญส่วนหนึ่งของกฎบัญญัติ ที่ให้ไว้แก่ชาวอิสราเอล แต่ถ้าความเป็นปุโรหิตสามารถทำหน้าที่ได้อย่างเพียบพร้อมทุกประการแล้ว ก็ไม่จำเป็นต้องมีปุโรหิตอีกท่านมาปรากฏ เป็นปุโรหิตตามแบบอย่างเมลคีเซเดค ซึ่งไม่เหมือนกับปุโรหิตที่สืบเชื้อสายมาจากตระกูลอาโรน

交叉引用

Hebrews 6:20 - Jesus has already gone in there for us. He has become our eternal High Priest in the order of Melchizedek.
Galatians 4:9 - So now that you know God (or should I say, now that God knows you), why do you want to go back again and become slaves once more to the weak and useless spiritual principles of this world?
Hebrews 8:10 - But this is the new covenant I will make with the people of Israel on that day, says the Lord: I will put my laws in their minds, and I will write them on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people.
Hebrews 8:11 - And they will not need to teach their neighbors, nor will they need to teach their relatives, saying, ‘You should know the Lord.’ For everyone, from the least to the greatest, will know me already.
Hebrews 8:12 - And I will forgive their wickedness, and I will never again remember their sins.”
Hebrews 8:13 - When God speaks of a “new” covenant, it means he has made the first one obsolete. It is now out of date and will soon disappear.
Hebrews 5:10 - And God designated him to be a High Priest in the order of Melchizedek.
Hebrews 10:1 - The old system under the law of Moses was only a shadow, a dim preview of the good things to come, not the good things themselves. The sacrifices under that system were repeated again and again, year after year, but they were never able to provide perfect cleansing for those who came to worship.
Hebrews 10:2 - If they could have provided perfect cleansing, the sacrifices would have stopped, for the worshipers would have been purified once for all time, and their feelings of guilt would have disappeared.
Hebrews 10:3 - But instead, those sacrifices actually reminded them of their sins year after year.
Hebrews 10:4 - For it is not possible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins.
Hebrews 7:21 - but there was an oath regarding Jesus. For God said to him, “The Lord has taken an oath and will not break his vow: ‘You are a priest forever.’”
Hebrews 7:15 - This change has been made very clear since a different priest, who is like Melchizedek, has appeared.
Colossians 2:10 - So you also are complete through your union with Christ, who is the head over every ruler and authority.
Colossians 2:11 - When you came to Christ, you were “circumcised,” but not by a physical procedure. Christ performed a spiritual circumcision—the cutting away of your sinful nature.
Colossians 2:12 - For you were buried with Christ when you were baptized. And with him you were raised to new life because you trusted the mighty power of God, who raised Christ from the dead.
Colossians 2:13 - You were dead because of your sins and because your sinful nature was not yet cut away. Then God made you alive with Christ, for he forgave all our sins.
Colossians 2:14 - He canceled the record of the charges against us and took it away by nailing it to the cross.
Colossians 2:15 - In this way, he disarmed the spiritual rulers and authorities. He shamed them publicly by his victory over them on the cross.
Colossians 2:16 - So don’t let anyone condemn you for what you eat or drink, or for not celebrating certain holy days or new moon ceremonies or Sabbaths.
Colossians 2:17 - For these rules are only shadows of the reality yet to come. And Christ himself is that reality.
Galatians 4:3 - And that’s the way it was with us before Christ came. We were like children; we were slaves to the basic spiritual principles of this world.
Hebrews 7:17 - And the psalmist pointed this out when he prophesied, “You are a priest forever in the order of Melchizedek.”
Hebrews 7:18 - Yes, the old requirement about the priesthood was set aside because it was weak and useless.
Hebrews 7:19 - For the law never made anything perfect. But now we have confidence in a better hope, through which we draw near to God.
Hebrews 5:6 - And in another passage God said to him, “You are a priest forever in the order of Melchizedek.”
Galatians 2:21 - I do not treat the grace of God as meaningless. For if keeping the law could make us right with God, then there was no need for Christ to die.
Hebrews 8:7 - If the first covenant had been faultless, there would have been no need for a second covenant to replace it.

逐节对照

交叉引用

New Living Translation - So if the priesthood of Levi, on which the law was based, could have achieved the perfection God intended, why did God need to establish a different priesthood, with a priest in the order of Melchizedek instead of the order of Levi and Aaron?
新标点和合本 - 从前百姓在利未人祭司职任以下受律法，倘若藉这职任能得完全，又何用另外兴起一位祭司，照麦基洗德的等次，不照亚伦的等次呢？
和合本2010（上帝版-简体） - 那么，如果百姓藉着利未人的祭司职任能达到完全—因为百姓是在这职分下领受律法的—为什么还需要按照麦基洗德的体系另外兴起一位祭司，而不按照亚伦的体系呢？
和合本2010（神版-简体） - 那么，如果百姓藉着利未人的祭司职任能达到完全—因为百姓是在这职分下领受律法的—为什么还需要按照麦基洗德的体系另外兴起一位祭司，而不按照亚伦的体系呢？
当代译本 - 以色列人在利未祭司制度的基础上承受律法，如果通过这个祭司制度可以达到纯全，又何必照麦基洗德的模式而不是亚伦的模式，另外兴起一位祭司呢？
圣经新译本 - 这样看来，如果藉着利未人的祭司制度能达到完全的地步（人民是在这制度下领受律法的），为什么还需要照着麦基洗德的体系，另外兴起一位祭司，而不照着亚伦的体系呢？
中文标准译本 - 既然如此，如果藉着利未人的祭司职份能达到完全——子民本来在这职份下领受了律法——那么，为什么还需要照着麦基洗德的等级，而不照着所谓“亚伦的等级”兴起另一位祭司呢？
现代标点和合本 - 从前百姓在利未人祭司职任以下受律法，倘若藉这职任能得完全，又何用另外兴起一位祭司，照麦基洗德的等次，不照亚伦的等次呢？
和合本（拼音版） - 从前百姓在利未人祭司职任以下受律法，倘若藉这职任能得完全，又何用另外兴起一位祭司，照麦基洗德的等次，不照亚伦的等次呢？
New International Version - If perfection could have been attained through the Levitical priesthood—and indeed the law given to the people established that priesthood—why was there still need for another priest to come, one in the order of Melchizedek, not in the order of Aaron?
New International Reader's Version - The law that was given to the people called for the priestly system. That system began with Levi. Suppose the priestly system could have made people perfect. Then why was there still a need for another priest to come? And why did he need to be like Melchizedek? Why wasn’t he from Aaron’s family line?
English Standard Version - Now if perfection had been attainable through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need would there have been for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, rather than one named after the order of Aaron?
The Message - If the priesthood of Levi and Aaron, which provided the framework for the giving of the law, could really make people perfect, there wouldn’t have been need for a new priesthood like that of Melchizedek. But since it didn’t get the job done, there was a change of priesthood, which brought with it a radical new kind of law. There is no way of understanding this in terms of the old Levitical priesthood, which is why there is nothing in Jesus’ family tree connecting him with that priestly line.
Christian Standard Bible - Now if perfection came through the Levitical priesthood (for on the basis of it the people received the law ), what further need was there for another priest to appear, said to be according to the order of Melchizedek and not according to the order of Aaron?
New American Standard Bible - So if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for on the basis of it the people received the Law), what further need was there for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be designated according to the order of Aaron?
New King James Version - Therefore, if perfection were through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need was there that another priest should rise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be called according to the order of Aaron?
Amplified Bible - Now if perfection [a perfect fellowship between God and the worshiper] had been attained through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people were given the Law) what further need was there for another and different kind of priest to arise, one in the manner of Melchizedek, rather than one appointed to the order of Aaron?
American Standard Version - Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it hath the people received the law), what further need was there that another priest should arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be reckoned after the order of Aaron?
King James Version - If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
New English Translation - So if perfection had in fact been possible through the Levitical priesthood – for on that basis the people received the law – what further need would there have been for another priest to arise, said to be in the order of Melchizedek and not in Aaron’s order?
World English Bible - Now if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need was there for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
新標點和合本 - 從前百姓在利未人祭司職任以下受律法，倘若藉這職任能得完全，又何用另外興起一位祭司，照麥基洗德的等次，不照亞倫的等次呢？
和合本2010（上帝版-繁體） - 那麼，如果百姓藉着利未人的祭司職任能達到完全－因為百姓是在這職分下領受律法的－為甚麼還需要按照麥基洗德的體系另外興起一位祭司，而不按照亞倫的體系呢？
和合本2010（神版-繁體） - 那麼，如果百姓藉着利未人的祭司職任能達到完全—因為百姓是在這職分下領受律法的—為甚麼還需要按照麥基洗德的體系另外興起一位祭司，而不按照亞倫的體系呢？
當代譯本 - 以色列人在利未祭司制度的基礎上承受律法，如果通過這個祭司制度可以達到純全，又何必照麥基洗德的模式而不是亞倫的模式，另外興起一位祭司呢？
聖經新譯本 - 這樣看來，如果藉著利未人的祭司制度能達到完全的地步（人民是在這制度下領受律法的），為甚麼還需要照著麥基洗德的體系，另外興起一位祭司，而不照著亞倫的體系呢？
呂振中譯本 - 這樣看來，倘若藉着利未人的祭司職分能有完全勝任的資格（而人民之領受了律法倒是以這職分為基本），哪裏還需要另一種的一位祭司興起來、是照麥基洗德的等次、而不稱為照亞倫的等次呢？
中文標準譯本 - 既然如此，如果藉著利未人的祭司職份能達到完全——子民本來在這職份下領受了律法——那麼，為什麼還需要照著麥基洗德的等級，而不照著所謂「亞倫的等級」興起另一位祭司呢？
現代標點和合本 - 從前百姓在利未人祭司職任以下受律法，倘若藉這職任能得完全，又何用另外興起一位祭司，照麥基洗德的等次，不照亞倫的等次呢？
文理和合譯本 - 昔民在利未人祭司職下受律、若由之而得完全、則何須別興一祭司依麥基洗德之班、而不謂之依亞倫班乎、
文理委辦譯本 - 昔民受律例時、利未子孫任祭司職、若人賴此、罔有缺乏、則毋庸別設一祭司、依麥基洗德班聯、不依亞倫班聯、
施約瑟淺文理新舊約聖經 - 昔民受律法、即在利未子孫得祭司職之時、若賴此祭司之職、能得成全、何用別設一祭司、循麥基洗德之等次、而不循亞倫之等次乎、又作人若賴利未子孫所得祭司之職能得成全何須別設一祭司循麥基洗德之等次而非循亞倫之等次乎民所受之律法與此祭司之職實有關係
吳經熊文理聖詠與新經全集 - 夫斯民之受律法也、乃在利未子孫為司祭之時。假使陳制而能躋人於純全之域、則何須復有異軍突起之司祭；而且此司祭何不與亞倫同一支派、而獨與麥基德同一班次耶？
Nueva Versión Internacional - Si hubiera sido posible alcanzar la perfección mediante el sacerdocio levítico (pues bajo este se le dio la ley al pueblo), ¿qué necesidad había de que más adelante surgiera otro sacerdote, según el orden de Melquisedec y no según el de Aarón?
현대인의 성경 - 하나님은 레위 계통의 제사장 직분에 근거하여 율법을 주셨습니다. 그런데 그 제사장 직무가 완전해질 수 있었다면 어째서 아론의 계통이 아닌 멜기세덱의 계통에서 다른 제사장을 세울 필요가 있었겠습니까?
Новый Русский Перевод - Если бы совершенство достигалось через священство левитов (а оно было существенной частью Закона, который был дан народу), то разве была бы нужда в другом священнике – по чину Мелхиседека, а не по чину Аарона?
Восточный перевод - Если бы цель Всевышнего достигалась через священство левитов (а оно было существенной частью Закона, который был дан народу), то разве была бы нужда в другом священнослужителе – подобном Малик-Цедеку, а не подобном Харуну?
Восточный перевод, версия с «Аллахом» - Если бы цель Аллаха достигалась через священство левитов (а оно было существенной частью Закона, который был дан народу), то разве была бы нужда в другом священнослужителе – подобном Малик-Цедеку, а не подобном Харуну?
Восточный перевод, версия для Таджикистана - Если бы цель Всевышнего достигалась через священство левитов (а оно было существенной частью Закона, который был дан народу), то разве была бы нужда в другом священнослужителе – подобном Малик-Цедеку, а не подобном Хоруну?
La Bible du Semeur 2015 - La Loi donnée au peuple d’Israël repose sur le sacerdoce lévitique. Or, s’il avait été possible d’atteindre la perfection par ce sacerdoce, pourquoi était-il nécessaire d’établir un autre prêtre, selon la ligne de Melchisédek, et non pas selon la ligne d’Aaron ?
リビングバイブル - もし、ユダヤ人の祭司と律法に私たちを救う力があるとしたら、なぜ神は、あえてアロンの位に等しい祭司〔ユダヤ人の祭司はすべてアロンの位を受け継いでいる〕ではなく、メルキゼデクの位に等しい祭司であるキリストをお立てになったのでしょうか。
Nestle Aland 28 - Εἰ μὲν οὖν τελείωσις διὰ τῆς Λευιτικῆς ἱερωσύνης ἦν, ὁ λαὸς γὰρ ἐπ’ αὐτῆς νενομοθέτηται, τίς ἔτι χρεία κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Μελχισέδεκ ἕτερον ἀνίστασθαι ἱερέα καὶ οὐ κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Ἀαρὼν λέγεσθαι;
unfoldingWord® Greek New Testament - εἰ μὲν οὖν τελείωσις διὰ τῆς Λευειτικῆς ἱερωσύνης ἦν, ὁ λαὸς γὰρ ἐπ’ αὐτῆς νενομοθέτηται, τίς ἔτι χρεία κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Μελχισέδεκ, ἕτερον ἀνίστασθαι ἱερέα, καὶ οὐ κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Ἀαρὼν λέγεσθαι?
Nova Versão Internacional - Se fosse possível alcançar a perfeição por meio do sacerdócio levítico (visto que em sua vigência o povo recebeu a Lei), por que haveria ainda necessidade de se levantar outro sacerdote, segundo a ordem de Melquisedeque e não de Arão?
Hoffnung für alle - Das Priestertum der Leviten – und das Gesetz kennt nur dieses Priestertum – konnte uns offensichtlich nicht ans Ziel bringen und mit Gott versöhnen. Sonst hätte Gott doch nicht einen ganz anderen Priester vom Rang Melchisedeks zu uns schicken müssen. Dann hätte auch ein Priester vom Rang Aarons genügt.
Kinh Thánh Hiện Đại - Nếu công việc của các thầy tế lễ dòng họ Lê-vi đã hoàn hảo và có thể cứu rỗi chúng ta, sao phải cần một thầy tế lễ khác, theo dòng Mên-chi-xê-đéc chứ không theo dòng A-rôn, họ Lê-vi? Luật pháp ban hành cho người Do Thái được xây dựng trên chức quyền của thầy tế lễ.
พระคริสตธรรมคัมภีร์ไทย ฉบับอมตธรรมร่วมสมัย - หากมนุษย์มาถึงความครบถ้วนบริบูรณ์ในพระเจ้าได้โดยทางระบอบปุโรหิตตามแบบของเลวีแล้ว (เพราะโดยพื้นฐานของระบอบนี้บทบัญญัติจึงมีมาถึงเหล่าประชากร) ทำไมยังต้องมีปุโรหิตอีกผู้หนึ่งซึ่งเป็นปุโรหิตตามแบบของเมลคีเซเดค ไม่ใช่ตามแบบของอาโรน?
พระคัมภีร์ ฉบับแปลใหม่ - บรรดาปุโรหิตที่สืบเชื้อสายจากเผ่าเลวี เป็นรากฐานอันสำคัญส่วนหนึ่งของกฎบัญญัติ ที่ให้ไว้แก่ชาวอิสราเอล แต่ถ้าความเป็นปุโรหิตสามารถทำหน้าที่ได้อย่างเพียบพร้อมทุกประการแล้ว ก็ไม่จำเป็นต้องมีปุโรหิตอีกท่านมาปรากฏ เป็นปุโรหิตตามแบบอย่างเมลคีเซเดค ซึ่งไม่เหมือนกับปุโรหิตที่สืบเชื้อสายมาจากตระกูลอาโรน

Hebrews 6:20 - Jesus has already gone in there for us. He has become our eternal High Priest in the order of Melchizedek.
Galatians 4:9 - So now that you know God (or should I say, now that God knows you), why do you want to go back again and become slaves once more to the weak and useless spiritual principles of this world?
Hebrews 8:10 - But this is the new covenant I will make with the people of Israel on that day, says the Lord: I will put my laws in their minds, and I will write them on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people.
Hebrews 8:11 - And they will not need to teach their neighbors, nor will they need to teach their relatives, saying, ‘You should know the Lord.’ For everyone, from the least to the greatest, will know me already.
Hebrews 8:12 - And I will forgive their wickedness, and I will never again remember their sins.”
Hebrews 8:13 - When God speaks of a “new” covenant, it means he has made the first one obsolete. It is now out of date and will soon disappear.
Hebrews 5:10 - And God designated him to be a High Priest in the order of Melchizedek.
Hebrews 10:1 - The old system under the law of Moses was only a shadow, a dim preview of the good things to come, not the good things themselves. The sacrifices under that system were repeated again and again, year after year, but they were never able to provide perfect cleansing for those who came to worship.
Hebrews 10:2 - If they could have provided perfect cleansing, the sacrifices would have stopped, for the worshipers would have been purified once for all time, and their feelings of guilt would have disappeared.
Hebrews 10:3 - But instead, those sacrifices actually reminded them of their sins year after year.
Hebrews 10:4 - For it is not possible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins.
Hebrews 7:21 - but there was an oath regarding Jesus. For God said to him, “The Lord has taken an oath and will not break his vow: ‘You are a priest forever.’”
Hebrews 7:15 - This change has been made very clear since a different priest, who is like Melchizedek, has appeared.
Colossians 2:10 - So you also are complete through your union with Christ, who is the head over every ruler and authority.
Colossians 2:11 - When you came to Christ, you were “circumcised,” but not by a physical procedure. Christ performed a spiritual circumcision—the cutting away of your sinful nature.
Colossians 2:12 - For you were buried with Christ when you were baptized. And with him you were raised to new life because you trusted the mighty power of God, who raised Christ from the dead.
Colossians 2:13 - You were dead because of your sins and because your sinful nature was not yet cut away. Then God made you alive with Christ, for he forgave all our sins.
Colossians 2:14 - He canceled the record of the charges against us and took it away by nailing it to the cross.
Colossians 2:15 - In this way, he disarmed the spiritual rulers and authorities. He shamed them publicly by his victory over them on the cross.
Colossians 2:16 - So don’t let anyone condemn you for what you eat or drink, or for not celebrating certain holy days or new moon ceremonies or Sabbaths.
Colossians 2:17 - For these rules are only shadows of the reality yet to come. And Christ himself is that reality.
Galatians 4:3 - And that’s the way it was with us before Christ came. We were like children; we were slaves to the basic spiritual principles of this world.
Hebrews 7:17 - And the psalmist pointed this out when he prophesied, “You are a priest forever in the order of Melchizedek.”
Hebrews 7:18 - Yes, the old requirement about the priesthood was set aside because it was weak and useless.
Hebrews 7:19 - For the law never made anything perfect. But now we have confidence in a better hope, through which we draw near to God.
Hebrews 5:6 - And in another passage God said to him, “You are a priest forever in the order of Melchizedek.”
Galatians 2:21 - I do not treat the grace of God as meaningless. For if keeping the law could make us right with God, then there was no need for Christ to die.
Hebrews 8:7 - If the first covenant had been faultless, there would have been no need for a second covenant to replace it.