<< 羅馬書 7:7 >>

本节经文

  • 施約瑟淺文理新舊約聖經
    然則何言、律法即罪乎、非也、然非由律法、我不識罪、律法若不云勿貪、則我不識貪、
  • 新标点和合本
    这样，我们可说什么呢？律法是罪吗？断乎不是！只是非因律法，我就不知何为罪。非律法说“不可起贪心”，我就不知何为贪心。
  • 和合本2010（上帝版-简体）
    这样，我们要怎么说呢？律法是罪吗？绝对不是！但是，若不是藉着律法，我就不知何为罪；若不是律法说“不可贪心”，我就不知何为贪心。
  • 和合本2010（神版-简体）
    这样，我们要怎么说呢？律法是罪吗？绝对不是！但是，若不是藉着律法，我就不知何为罪；若不是律法说“不可贪心”，我就不知何为贪心。
  • 当代译本
    那么，我们可以说律法本身是罪吗？当然不是！没有律法，我们就不知道什么是罪。律法若不说“不可贪心”，我就不知道什么是贪心。
  • 圣经新译本
    这样，我们可以说什么呢？难道律法是罪吗？绝对不是。不过，如果不是藉着律法，我就不知道什么是罪；如果不是律法说“不可贪心”，我就不知道什么是贪心。
  • 中文标准译本
    那么，我们要怎么说呢？难道律法是罪吗？绝对不是！然而，要不是藉着律法，我就不知道什么是罪。如果律法没有说“不可贪心”，我就不知道什么是贪心；
  • 新標點和合本
    這樣，我們可說甚麼呢？律法是罪嗎？斷乎不是！只是非因律法，我就不知何為罪。非律法說「不可起貪心」，我就不知何為貪心。
  • 和合本2010（上帝版-繁體）
    這樣，我們要怎麼說呢？律法是罪嗎？絕對不是！但是，若不是藉着律法，我就不知何為罪；若不是律法說「不可貪心」，我就不知何為貪心。
  • 和合本2010（神版-繁體）
    這樣，我們要怎麼說呢？律法是罪嗎？絕對不是！但是，若不是藉着律法，我就不知何為罪；若不是律法說「不可貪心」，我就不知何為貪心。
  • 當代譯本
    那麼，我們可以說律法本身是罪嗎？當然不是！沒有律法，我們就不知道什麼是罪。律法若不說「不可貪心」，我就不知道什麼是貪心。
  • 聖經新譯本
    這樣，我們可以說甚麼呢？難道律法是罪嗎？絕對不是。不過，如果不是藉著律法，我就不知道甚麼是罪；如果不是律法說“不可貪心”，我就不知道甚麼是貪心。
  • 呂振中譯本
    這樣，我們可怎麼說呢？律法是罪麼？斷乎不是。不過、若不是由於律法，我就不知道罪是甚麼。若不是律法說：「你不可貪慾」，我就不知道貪慾是甚麼。
  • 中文標準譯本
    那麼，我們要怎麼說呢？難道律法是罪嗎？絕對不是！然而，要不是藉著律法，我就不知道什麼是罪。如果律法沒有說「不可貪心」，我就不知道什麼是貪心；
  • 文理和合譯本
    然則將何言耶、律豈罪乎、非也、非由律則我未嘗知罪、如律不言毋欲、則我不知欲、
  • 文理委辦譯本
    然則何以言之、律法豈惡之因乎、曰、不然、非法無以見惡、蓋律法不禁欲、吾末由識欲、
  • 吳經熊文理聖詠與新經全集
    於此吾人更有何說？將謂法即罪乎？無是理也！法非罪、乃所以燭吾之罪耳。法若不曰「毋淫、」則吾將不知淫之為淫矣。
  • New International Version
    What shall we say, then? Is the law sinful? Certainly not! Nevertheless, I would not have known what sin was had it not been for the law. For I would not have known what coveting really was if the law had not said,“ You shall not covet.”
  • New International Reader's Version
    What should we say then? That the law is sinful? Not at all! Yet I wouldn’t have known what sin was unless the law had told me. The law says,“ Do not want what belongs to other people.”( Exodus 20:17; Deuteronomy 5:21) If the law hadn’t said that, I would not have known what it was like to want what belongs to others.
  • English Standard Version
    What then shall we say? That the law is sin? By no means! Yet if it had not been for the law, I would not have known sin. For I would not have known what it is to covet if the law had not said,“ You shall not covet.”
  • New Living Translation
    Well then, am I suggesting that the law of God is sinful? Of course not! In fact, it was the law that showed me my sin. I would never have known that coveting is wrong if the law had not said,“ You must not covet.”
  • Christian Standard Bible
    What should we say then? Is the law sin? Absolutely not! But I would not have known sin if it were not for the law. For example, I would not have known what it is to covet if the law had not said, Do not covet.
  • New American Standard Bible
    What shall we say then? Is the Law sin? Far from it! On the contrary, I would not have come to know sin except through the Law; for I would not have known about coveting if the Law had not said,“ You shall not covet.”
  • New King James Version
    What shall we say then? Is the law sin? Certainly not! On the contrary, I would not have known sin except through the law. For I would not have known covetousness unless the law had said,“ You shall not covet.”
  • American Standard Version
    What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Howbeit, I had not known sin, except through the law: for I had not known coveting, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet:
  • Holman Christian Standard Bible
    What should we say then? Is the law sin? Absolutely not! On the contrary, I would not have known sin if it were not for the law. For example, I would not have known what it is to covet if the law had not said, Do not covet.
  • King James Version
    What shall we say then?[ Is] the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.
  • New English Translation
    What shall we say then? Is the law sin? Absolutely not! Certainly, I would not have known sin except through the law. For indeed I would not have known what it means to desire something belonging to someone else if the law had not said,“ Do not covet.”
  • World English Bible
    What shall we say then? Is the law sin? May it never be! However, I wouldn’t have known sin, except through the law. For I wouldn’t have known coveting, unless the law had said,“ You shall not covet.”

交叉引用

  • 羅馬書 3:20
    故無人由遵行律法、得稱義於天主前、蓋由律法可知罪耳、○
  • 羅馬書 7:8
    罪藉律法而乘機、使多慾動於我中、無律法、則罪死矣、
  • 出埃及記 20:17
    毋貪人之宅、毋貪人之妻、與奴婢牛驢、及其凡所有者、○
  • 申命記 5:21
    毋貪人之妻、毋貪人之宅、與田畝奴婢牛驢、及其凡所有者、
  • 羅馬書 4:15
    蓋律法致刑、無律法則無過犯、
  • 哥林多前書 15:56
    死之鋒鋩、罪也、罪之權勢、律法也、
  • 羅馬書 13:9
    所誡勿姦、勿殺、勿竊、勿妄證、勿貪、以及他誡、悉括於愛人如己一言之內、
  • 詩篇 19:7-12
    主之律法純全、可以蘇醒人心、主之法度真實、可以使愚人有智慧、主之命令正直、可以快樂人之心志、主之誡命純潔、可以明亮人之眼目、主之道理清淨、存至永遠、主之律例、極確實且至公義、較金寶貴、較極多之精金更加寶貴、甘勝於蜜、較蜂房之蜜尤甘、主之僕人因此受警戒、守此便得大賞、誤犯之罪、誰能知之、願主赦我暗中之過、
  • 羅馬書 3:5
    我今且按人言言之曰、若我儕之不義、顯彰天主之義、則何言哉、天主施刑、可謂其不義乎、
  • 以弗所書 5:3
    凡姦淫及諸污穢、與貪婪之事、在爾中即言之亦不可、蓋聖徒宜然也、
  • 創世記 3:6
    婦見其樹可食可觀、又能益智可慕、遂摘其果食之、並給其夫、夫亦食之、
  • 羅馬書 7:13
    然則善者可致我死乎、非也、乃罪藉善者使我死、以顯罪之為罪、致罪因誡愈形其惡者也、
  • 撒母耳記下 11:2
    一日將暮、大衛自床起、行於王宮之平頂、見一婦沐浴、婦貌甚美、
  • 詩篇 119:96
    我觀一切完全者、皆有窮盡、惟主之誡命、廣大無邊、○
  • 約書亞記 7:21
    我於奪獲貨財中、見自示拿來之美服一襲、銀二百舍客勒、約一百兩金一錠重五十舍客勒、約二十五兩我貪而取之、今物在我幕中藏於地、銀在衣下、
  • 路加福音 12:15
    遂謂眾曰、慎哉、勿貪婪、蓋人之生命、不在家貲豐裕、
  • 彌迦書 2:2
    貪田而奪之、貪宅而取之、待人以虐、待人以虐或作向人行強暴佔其室、據其業、
  • 馬太福音 5:28
    惟我告爾、凡見婦而動慾念者、則心己姦淫矣、
  • 羅馬書 4:1
    然則我祖亞伯拉罕、我儕可謂其以本身所行者以本身所行者原文作循肉體何所得乎、
  • 使徒行傳 20:33
    我未嘗貪人金銀衣服、
  • 羅馬書 7:5
    蓋我儕屬肉體之時、罪慾由律法而生者、動於我肢體、使我儕結果以致死、
  • 約翰一書 2:15-16
    勿愛斯世及斯世之物、人若愛斯世、則愛父之愛、不在其內、蓋凡在世、如肉體之慾、眼目之慾、及一生一生或作富有之驕奢、皆非由父、乃由世也、
  • 歌羅西書 3:5
    故當滅爾在地之肢體所作之罪、即姦淫、污穢、邪侈、惡慾、貪婪、貪婪與拜偶像同罪、
  • 列王紀上 21:1-4
    斯事之後、又有一事、耶斯烈人拿伯、有一葡萄園、近撒瑪利亞王亞哈之宮、亞哈謂拿伯曰、爾葡萄園、近我之宮、爾以之予我為蔬圃、我予爾更佳之葡萄園以易之、如爾願鬻、我則以其所值之金予爾、拿伯謂亞哈曰、我畏主、不敢以我先人所遺之業予爾、亞哈因耶斯烈人拿伯言、不敢以先人所遺之業予爾、憂鬱不樂而歸宮、偃臥於床、面向壁而不食、
  • 帖撒羅尼迦前書 4:5
    勿縱慾如彼不知天主之異邦人、
  • 羅馬書 7:11
    蓋罪藉誡乘機誘我、且以之殺我、
  • 羅馬書 6:15
    然則何也、不屬律法下、而屬恩寵下、則可犯罪乎、非也、